Columbia Basin Trust Restitution
+1 250 442 2722


When the Columbia Basin Trust was formed in 1995, the Boundary area was arbitrarily eliminated from inclusion in the CBT. By legislation, the Boundary area comprises the southwestern corner of the Kootenay Region and enjoys a close service, demographic and economic affiliation with the Kootenays

 


pic
Click to make larger

 

The Boundary Communities for Columbia Basin Trust Restitution Committee is comprised of municipal and community representatives proactively working, since the inception of the Columbia Basin Act and the exclusion of the Boundary area from its traditional Kootenay affiliation, to rectify this situation.

Please read the attached documents in order to fully understand the case the Boundary Communities are making with respect
to inclusion in the CBT.

pic
Click to enlarge

The southern portion of the Kootenay
Region sharing common characteristics 
 


Excerpts from the Junger Report (2001):

Mr. Robin Junger LLB, with a Masters in Law from Harvard who specializes in public policy issues was appointed by the Minister Responsible for the CBT to investigate the historical relationship between the Columbia Basin Trust and the Boundary Communities. His four findings and two recommendations speak for themselves.

Finding#1 Throughout the discussions leading to the development of the Trust, there was a lack of clarity regarding the scope and limit of the area that would benefit, and it is not unreasonable for Boundary representatives to have assumed that the Trust would benefit the entire Regional District of Kootenay Boundary.

Finding #2 The possibility of differing assumptions or positions regarding the geographic scope of the Trust was not adequately addressed at the time the Act was drafted, as the definition of “region”was determined in a manner that lacked the transparency and inclusiveness which characterized other aspects of discussions.

Finding #3 The substantive question of whether the Boundary Region should be included in the Trust “region” at this time is difficult to answer, as there are reasonable arguments made by each of the parties… (there is) an the absence of a single set of clear and comprehensive criteria accepted by all participants.

Finding #4 The concern of the Boundary residents regarding their lack of inclusion in the Trust “region” is being exacerbated by Trust policies that are seen to have a negative impact on regional initiatives involving (or potentially involving) non-Trust areas,


The Columbia Basin Act 4(1) does state:

The purpose of the corporation is to invest, spend and otherwise manage the regional allocation and the corporations other assets, including any assets that may be transferred to it, for the ongoing economic, environmental and social benefit of the region including, without limitation, for

  • the social well-being of the residents of the region,
  • the preservation, protection and enhancement of the environment of the region,
  • the economic development of the region, and
  • any other prescribed purposes.

Supporting Documentation

BCCBTR Presentation-
Requires Quicktime (25.5mb)

BCCBTR Case

ANKORS - Letter of Support

Grand Forks District Savings Credit Union
CBT support.pdf

City of Grand Forks - Letter of Support

City Of Greenwood - Letter of Support

Village of Midway - Letter of Support

RDKB Area C - Letter of Support

USCC - Letter of Support

Letter of Support Options for Sexual Health Branch Board

Boundary Integrated Services Network - Letter of Support

Boundary Rotary Club - Letter of Support

Bounary Child and Youth Commitee - Letter of Support

Junger Report
(Findings and Recommendations pp 26-31)




 

Why not Boundary?

For more information please contact:

Margaret Maximenko
margaret@boundarycf.com
ph: 250 442 2722


Last Updated: April 13, 2007

Free Web Counters